-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add conditional statement #271
Conversation
ecat validation unchanged
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me - I have asked @bendhouseart to carry out a few more tests also comparing with Turku's ecat2nii, so he might have additional feedback.
@mnoergaard actually needs to be the other way around -- all our phantoms seems calibrated ! |
It's beautiful > In ecat2nii (line 334)
Warning: it looks like the source data are already dose calibrated - ecat2nii is thus not scaling the data
> In ecat2nii (line 339) |
Alright, the Nii's produced by this look like they're scaling to the same range as the original ecats viewed in Vinci and as the outputs from Turku. Below is a comparison of the the outputs from a previous commit on this branch compared to the current status 2165535 done in freeview: Looks good to me 👍 |
ecat validation remains unchanged by adding this statement
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pet2bids--271.org.readthedocs.build/en/271/